End Mass Criminalization of Black and Brown Youth

End Racism and Discrimination

End Homelessness Now

Expand and Protect Social Security

Support Labor, Jobs for All

The People's Budget

Gender-Neutral Treatment - The Equal Rights Amendment

Tuesday, 30 December 2014 00:00

5 Most Economically Vulnerable Groups of Aging Americans Who Need Social Security

Written by Nancy J. Altman and Eric R. Kingson |AlterNet
 
 

(Editor’s note: The following is an excerpt from a new book, “Social Security Works! Why Social Security Isn’t Going Broke and How Expanding It Will Help Us All,” published by The New Press, 2015, all rights reserved. Order a copy here.)

As important as Social Security is for virtually all of today’s older Americans—and will be in the future—there is still much to be done to achieve the promise of economic security in old age. Expanding Social Security is important for all of us, but it is especially important for five groups of older Americans: women; people of color; the LGBT community; low-wage workers and early retirees; and the oldest old.

1. Women: Women are at greater risk, even with Social Security, than men are of entering old age in precarious financial circumstances or of suffering large declines in income and possible impoverishment. Persistent gender gaps in wages, societal expectations that women will leave work to perform care-giving duties (for both children and aging parents), greater longevity, and lower rates of private pensions and savings compared to men all contribute to this increased risk. Because of their longer average life expectancies, women are also at greater risk of outliving their resources, as well as having them greatly erode in value, since—with the exception of their Social Security—what supplemental pensions they do have are generally not protected against inflation.

Women comprise 56 percent of Social Security beneficiaries age 62 and over, and almost 67 percent of beneficiaries age 85 and older. Single women age 65 and older received 50.4 percent of their income from Social Security, compared to 35.9 percent for elderly single men and 32 percent for elderly couples. Without Social Security, the poverty rate among older women, according to the official poverty measure, would increase from the current 11 percent to 48 percent. But, as the upcoming story of Theresa B. illustrates, even with Social Security, the economic status of women can be precarious, especially for those who are single as a result of divorce, the death of a spouse, or never marrying. The poverty rates for such women are among the highest for any subgroup in the country. While the poverty rate for a married couple (over age65) is only 5.4 percent, the poverty rate for a woman living alone (over age 65) is 18.9 percent.

The Case of Theresa

Theresa is a 59-year-old college-educated white woman living in Rainbow City, Alabama. She married at age 25 but was divorced at 30. She remarried at 33 and has two children from that marriage. Her husband, a building contractor, left her eight years later. She managed to get child support and half their savings of $25,000, which helped her get by while the children were young. She has worked as a preschool teacher and also selling cosmetics at a department store. However, she has not held a full-time job since 2000, when her mother developed cancer and required Theresa’s full-time care. Her mother is now deceased, but Theresa still lives with her father, a former mechanic who is 92 and requires constant care. As Theresa approaches her own retirement years, she has no savings and no supplemental pension. Her father receives a monthly Social Security benefit of $1,100. (In 2014, his Medicare Part B premium, which is deducted directly from his check, reduced his monthly benefit by $104.90, and out-of-pocket health care costs take a bigger bite each year since they are outpacing his annual cost of living increases.) Because Theresa was not married to either of her former spouses for at least ten years, she is ineligible for spousal benefits and must qualify for Social Security solely on her own limited earnings record. According to her most recent Social Security earnings statement, Theresa’s Social Security would be $985 a month if she waits until age 66 to start her benefit, but less than $738 a month if she takes her Social Security when she turns 62, which she thinks she will need to do.

2. People of Color:  Similarly, Social Security is extremely important to African Americans, Hispanics, and other people of color. Disadvantaged minority populations are more likely to have lower lifetime earnings, due to a variety of factors, including lower educational attainment, employment discrimination, physically challenging employment, and higher rates of unemployment. They are also more likely to suffer disabilities.

Social Security is designed to provide economic protection against these disadvantages. It especially benefits those who have lower lifetime earnings and longer periods of unemployment. Moreover, Social Security protects workers and their families economically against the risks of disability and premature death. Social Security is also particularly important to minority workers and their dependents because they have far lower rates of employer-provided retirement, life, and disability insurance coverage.

In 2012, among beneficiary households with at least one person age 65 or over, Social Security provides at least 90 percent of the income for 46 percent of African Americans, 53 percent of Latinos, and 44 percent of Asians. Without Social Security, the poverty rate among African American seniors would triple, from 17 to 50 percent, and the poverty rate among Hispanic American seniors would rise from 19 to 50 percent. Because of their poorer health and more physically demanding jobs, these groups tend to rely more heavily on Social Security’s disability and survivor protections as well.

3. LGBT community:  Because members of the LGBT community also suffer discrimination in the workplace, Social Security is particularly important to them as well. Indeed, as a result of the so-called Defense of Marriage Act, members of this community who were committed to each other nevertheless were not entitled to the spouse, divorced spouse, and widow(er) protections that heterosexual couples enjoyed.

Thanks to the recognition of same-sex marriages in more and more states, together with the 2013 Supreme Court case holding unconstitutional major parts of the Defense of Marriage Act, these protections are now increasingly available for this segment of the American community, but much still needs to be done to assure their equal treatment.

4. Low-wage workers and many early retirees: Many of today’s seniors who accepted permanently reduced Social Security benefits are also at special risk. The vast majority of Social Security retirees in 2009—2 million out of 2.7 million—accepted permanently reduced benefits before reaching the full retirement age of 66. Nearly half, 1.3 million, accepted these benefits at age 62, when benefit reductions are largest. Many who have accepted reduced benefits over the years had little or no choice due to health and employment circumstances. Twenty-seven percent of all workers age 60 to 61 report a “work-limiting health condition,” with higher percentages reported for minority workers—36.5 percent of African Americans and 31.5 percent of Latinos. 

Moreover, 45 percent of workers age 58 and older work in jobs that are either physically demanding or have other difficult working conditions. These older workers are likely to have great difficulty holding a job and are primed to become disadvantaged retirees.

Social Security’s companion program, Supplemental Security Income (SSI), plays an important role in assisting the most low-income elderly persons.  In 2014, SSI provided a federal income guarantee of up to $721 a month for individuals and $1,082 for couples to roughly 8.4 million low-income, severely disabled, blind, or aged (65 and over) people. Some states provide modest supplements on top of the federal guarantee. Even so, SSI fails to provide income that permits more than the bare necessities.

5. The oldest old: The reliance on Social Security is even greater as people age and exhaust other sources of support. For beneficiary households with at least one person age 80 or over, three out of four rely on Social Security for half or more of their income. For almost one out of two—47 percent—Social Security constitutes 90 percent or more of their income.  For widowed, divorced, or never-married women, and for people of color, the percentages are even higher at those ages.

Link to original article from AlterNet

Read 4472 times

Latest Economic and Social Justice News

  • 1

Willie Nelson - Keeping the Postal Service Alive

Email President Obama Stop the Dakota Access Pipeline

Featured News

  • Veterans Arrive at Standing Rock to Act as 'Human Shields' for Water Protectors +

    As tensions grow in North Dakota, with multiple eviction orders facing the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe in their battle against Read More
  • Michigan Fights To Avoid Delivering Water To Flint Residents +

    The ongoing crisis has left the city without safe drinking water for over two years, but the state claims water Read More
  • The System IS Rigged!—The Electoral College and the 2016 Election +

    Donald Trump was right: the system is rigged! But it is rigged for the Republicans, not the Democrats, for conservatives, Read More
  • BREAKING: Cop Who Shot Keith Scott on Video Will Not Be Charged +

    The Charlotte police officer who killed Keith Lamont Scott will not be charged. In a news conference on Wednesday, R. Andrew Read More
  • Army Corps Says It Won’t Forcibly Evict Standing Rock Water Protectors, But Refuse To Elaborate +

    In a follow-up of its letter to leaders of the Standing Rock Sioux and Cheyenne River Sioux Tribes, the U.S. Read More
  • DAPL Investors Getting Antsy: If Pipeline Doesn’t Move Oil by January First the Contract EXPIRES +

    Though water protectors have held their ground at Standing Rock against the Dakota Access pipeline for months now, they need Read More
  • WV Supreme Court: No Pipeline Surveys for Private Gain +

    West Virginia property owners won an important case at the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals on Tuesday when that Read More
  • Clinton Campaign Joins Jill Stein’s Recount Of Votes In Wisconsin +

    Hillary Clinton’s campaign on Saturday announced they would participate in former Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein’s recount of the Read More
  • Sioux Tribe Leader Responds to Army Corps Eviction Letter With Ominous Warning to US Gov’t +

    In response to the altogether shocking announcement the Army Corps of Engineers will be evicting water protectors from the Oceti Read More
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22

Economic and Social Justice Calls

  • 5-4-2016 Economic and Social Justice Call
    The team explores the concept, economic theories and realities of achieving Full Employment in the current economy. Guests include Conor Williams, the secretary of the Transitional Jobs Collaborative in Milwaukee and Michael Darner, Executive Director of the Congressional Progressive Caucus.
  • 02-03-2016 Economic & Social Justice
    Listen to this month's call led by Jim Carpenter as we discuss the state of our current economy, the impact of poor economic choices, and the other factors that play into the declining situation around the country, and in the world in this open and guided conversation.
  • 01-06-2016 Economic & Social Justice
    PDAction Board Member Donald Whitehead, and former Ex. Dir. of the Coalition for the Homeless leads the discussion on homelessness, with input from Joel Segal, PDAmerica founding member and National Director of the Justice Action Mobilization Network. Special focus is given to the housing crisis, the role of the banks, programs used by other countries to alleviate the problem, as well as the fact that women are the most adversely affected by this issue. H Con Res 98 - Resolve to Eliminate Homelessness - has been introduced in Congress by Rep. Alma Adams (NC-12) and is endorsed on this call.